[PATCH v3] Fix problem with imx_ddrc_sdram_size calc
Sascha Hauer
sha at pengutronix.de
Tue Nov 16 23:23:57 PST 2021
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 03:05:39PM +0100, Joacim Zetterling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Joacim,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:11:09PM +0100, Joacim Zetterling wrote:
> > > There was some issues with the imx_ddrc_sdram_size calculation.
> > >
> > > If we compare the imx8mn DDR4 evk against the LPDDR4 variant in
> > > code and in the datasheets, we see the following:
> > >
> > > DDR4 LPDDR4
> > > ========================
> > > Bus width 16 16
> > > Rank 1 1
> > > Ranks 1 1
> > > Banks 4 8
> > > Banks grps 2 1
> > > Rows 17 15
> > > Col 10 10
> > >
> > > This gives us the following problems:
> > >
> > > 1. Bus width problem.
> > > Does not support 16 bit SDRAM bus mode, only 32 bit supported
> > >
> > > 2. Row size problem.
> > > Only up to 16 bit row size support.
> > >
> > > 3. Bank groups support.
> > > Only support of 1 bank group.
> > >
> > > 4. Bit count problem.
> > > The imx_ddrc_count_bits function does not do a correct count.
> >
> > Could you split this into four patches fixing one problem at a time?
> > I am not sure the problems can be separated from each other entirely,
> > but splitting this up would make it much easier to understand the
> > problems and also their fixes. We'll be glad having smaller patches
> > should we ever have to look at this again.
> >
> > Sascha
> I agree with You that the problems can not be separated completely.
> But I will try to do my best. Do You prefer a patch set or separately
> patches or a combination of them both?
A patch set would be fine.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list