[PATCH 1/7] driver: introduce less error-prone dev_get_drvdata alternative
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Tue Sep 29 05:42:04 EDT 2020
Hello Sascha,
On 9/29/20 9:32 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> We use dev_get_drvdata to get the driver match data associated with a
>> device. This has two shortcomings:
>>
>> - Linux has dev_get_drvdata too, which returns a private pointer for
>> driver specific info to associate with a device. We use dev->priv
>> (or more often container_of) for that in barebox instead
>>
>> - It nearly always involves a cast to a double pointer, which is
>> error-prone as size and alignment match need to be ensured
>> on the programmer's part and can easily be gotten wrong:
>> enum dev_type type
>> dev_get_drvdata(dev, (const void **)&type);
>>
>> Add a new function that instead of using a double pointer argument,
>> returns the pointer directly:
>>
>> - For normal pointer driver data, no cast is necessary
>> - For integer driver data casted to a pointer for storage,
>> the cast is still necessary, but
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/driver.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> include/driver.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
>> index 412db6c40699..3205bbc3c33b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
>> @@ -500,3 +500,14 @@ int dev_get_drvdata(struct device_d *dev, const void **data)
>>
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>> +
>> +const void *device_get_match_data(struct device_d *dev)
>> +{
>> + if (dev->of_id_entry)
>> + return dev->of_id_entry->data;
>> +
>> + if (dev->id_entry)
>> + return (void *)dev->id_entry->driver_data;
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>
> Can we please give the caller a possibility to distinguish between
> errors and a valid NULL pointer?
The only error possible is that we matched the device by name
and not of_compatible or platform id entry.
If the match data is a valid pointer:
-> It doesn't matter, why we have no match data either way.
If the match data is a casted integer (e.g. enum):
The driver author should either:
-> place the default enum value as first one,
so no match data => default
-> should add an initial DEVICE_TYPE_UNKNOWN = 0 in the enum
and handle it appropriately
I like the function signature like that, I don't really see
a need to adjust it.
> As you realize in your series some drivers cast the returned value into
> an integer type and use 0 as a valid possibility. These need an extra
> explanation why we can accept that case. I can think of different
> possibilies to get that straight:
>
> - Put a real pointer into matchdata. This is really preferred as it
> motivates people to put flags into a (struct type) matchdata which
> doesn't lead to excessive if (type == foo || type == bar || type ==
> baz) we sometimes see in drivers.
We have a real pointer there already. The problem is migrating the
existing drivers.
> - Return an ERR_PTR from device_get_match_data(). this is less likely
> interpreted as a valid int value
Doesn't cover all cases. Also for the normal use, it means
you need to have to check with IS_ERR_OR_NULL everywhere to
be sure you don't dereference a NULL pointer.
> - add a int * ret argument to device_get_match_data() which returns
> the error code.
Would work, but my preference is leaving it to the drivers.
The drivers need to handle errors anyway.
>
> Sascha
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list