[PATCH] MIPS: DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR is 0, use a0 instead
Du Huanpeng
u74147 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 17 09:56:08 EDT 2020
Hi, this patch should not intoduce any regression to existing boards,
because:
1. pass divisor by DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR
#define DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR NUMBER
which the ``NUMBER'' is not ``0'' (zero). In this case, this patch
has no effect and this line of code will be removed by preprocessor,
before compile :)
move t1, a0
2. Pass divisor by a0
#define DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR 0
recalculate the divisor is needed when the pll/div setting is changed
outside of barebox. e.g. ejtag. and load barebox and run in ram.
Because 0 maybe an invalid value for a divisor, so I take this value for
a hint to pass a0 as divisor. this will not conflict with other boards
which pass divisor by defining DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR with a valied value.
> you should migrate all users of this function all at once to supply a valid divisor
> (probably `move a0, DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR`).
MIPS use ``li'' load immediate, and move to copy inter registers.
so, maybe change my patch to:
#if DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR
li t1, DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR
#else
move t1, a0
#endif
- - -
or even do a bit tricky:
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static inline void PUTC_LL(char ch)
li t1, UART_LCR_DLAB /* DLAB on */
sb t1, UART_LCR(t0) /* Write it out */
- li t1, DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR
+ add t1, zero, DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR
sb t1, UART_DLL(t0) /* write low order byte */
srl t1, t1, 8
sb t1, UART_DLM(t0) /* write high order byte */
--
2.7.4
this will allow to pass divisor by a number or a register.
add is a pseudo insertion can be compile to addi or add depends
on the DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR is a number or a register.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:07:43PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 9/11/20 2:33 PM, Du Huanpeng wrote:
> > this make it possiable pass a0 as divisor to calculate uart baudrate
> > in run time on boot.
>
> This is not Ok. Your last commit has your board pass the divisor in a0 now, but other
> boards, like the netgear-wg102, don't. Your change might break their UART because the
> code there doesn't expect that a0 needs to have a valid value. If you want to do this,
> you should migrate all users of this function all at once to supply a valid divisor
> (probably `move a0, DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR`).
>
> It's same thing in C. You don't add a new parameter to a function without checking
> that all callsites handle this correctly.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Du Huanpeng <u74147 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h
> > index df58c4c..a33587a 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/debug_ll_ns16550.h
> > @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ static inline void PUTC_LL(char ch)
> > sb t1, UART_LCR(t0) /* Write it out */
> >
> > li t1, DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR
> > +#if DEBUG_LL_UART_DIVISOR == 0
> > + move t1, a0
> > +#endif
> > sb t1, UART_DLL(t0) /* write low order byte */
> > srl t1, t1, 8
> > sb t1, UART_DLM(t0) /* write high order byte */
> >
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Regards,
duhuanpeng
More information about the barebox
mailing list