[PATCH] treewide: remove stale instances of struct device
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Mon Aug 10 15:30:22 EDT 2020
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:02:16PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:22 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 08:15:23AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > > We call it struct device_d, any instances of struct device are likely
> > > left-over code after porting from Linux.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/crypto/caam/intern.h | 5 -----
> > > drivers/crypto/caam/jr.h | 2 --
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-sx150x.c | 1 -
> > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c | 9 ---------
> > > 4 files changed, 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks
> >
> > Sascha
>
>
> Why doesn't barebox use (struct device)?
For historical reasons. When creating barebox I thought that it's better
to not use the same struct name when they are not exactly compatible. We
have struct driver_d for the same reason.
I am not sure I would do the same again. If we find good reasons to name
them struct device and struct driver we can change that.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list