[PATCH 2/2] video: some framebuffer such as efi does support enable/disable
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Mar 9 23:26:49 PST 2017
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:57:21AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> so allow them to do not pass this function via fbops
> and indicate they are always on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/fb.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I partly applied this one on top of
[PATCH] video: call fb_[en|dis]able instead of fops directly
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fb.c b/drivers/video/fb.c
> index 6b88f2df9..63a818eb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fb.c
> @@ -19,10 +19,12 @@ static int fb_ioctl(struct cdev* cdev, int req, void *data)
> *fb = info;
> break;
> case FBIO_ENABLE:
> - info->fbops->fb_enable(info);
> + if (info->fbops->fb_enable)
> + info->fbops->fb_enable(info);
> break;
> case FBIO_DISABLE:
> - info->fbops->fb_disable(info);
> + if (info->fbops->fb_disable)
> + info->fbops->fb_disable(info);
> break;
> default:
> return -ENOSYS;
> @@ -94,7 +96,8 @@ int fb_enable(struct fb_info *info)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - info->fbops->fb_enable(info);
> + if (info->fbops->fb_enable)
> + info->fbops->fb_enable(info);
>
> info->enabled = true;
>
> @@ -106,7 +109,8 @@ int fb_disable(struct fb_info *info)
> if (!info->enabled)
> return 0;
>
> - info->fbops->fb_disable(info);
> + if (info->fbops->fb_disable)
> + info->fbops->fb_disable(info);
Making fb_enable/disable optional is fine and I applied this part.
>
> fb_release_shadowfb(info);
>
> @@ -266,6 +270,8 @@ static int fb_set_shadowfb(struct param_d *p, void *priv)
> return fb_alloc_shadowfb(info);
> }
>
> +struct fb_ops dummy_fbops;
> +
> int register_framebuffer(struct fb_info *info)
> {
> int id = get_free_deviceid("fb");
> @@ -273,6 +279,16 @@ int register_framebuffer(struct fb_info *info)
> int ret, num_modes, i;
> const char **names;
>
> + if (!info->p_enable) {
> + if (!info->fbops)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!info->fbops->fb_enable && !info->fbops->fb_disable)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + if (!info->fbops)
> + info->fbops = &dummy_fbops;
> + }
Making fbops optional is not what the patch descsription says.
> +
> dev = &info->dev;
>
> /*
> @@ -308,7 +324,10 @@ int register_framebuffer(struct fb_info *info)
> if (ret)
> goto err_free;
>
> - dev_add_param_bool(dev, "enable", fb_enable_set, NULL,
> + if (info->p_enable)
> + dev_add_param_int_ro(dev, "enable", info->p_enable, "%d");
> + else
> + dev_add_param_bool(dev, "enable", fb_enable_set, NULL,
> &info->p_enable, info);
Even when the framebuffer cannot physically disabled I think we
shouldn't throw an error when the user tries to.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list