[PATCH] ARM: imx: phyCORE i.MX7 on phyBOARD-Zeta support

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.07.2017, 17:27 +0200 schrieb Sam Ravnborg:
> > Hi Lucas
> > 
> > > index 000000000000..b1608dd9c730
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-imx7/flash-header-phytec-phycore-imx7.imxcfg
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2016 NXP Semiconductors
> > > + *
> > > + * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0
> > > + *
> > > + * Refer docs/README.imxmage for more details about how-to configure
> > > + * and create imximage boot image
> > > + *
> > > + * The syntax is taken as close as possible with the kwbimage
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +soc imx7
> > > +loadaddr 0x80000000
> > > +dcdofs 0x400
> > > +
> > > +wm 32 0x30340004 0x4F400005
> > > +/* Clear then set bit30 to ensure exit from DDR retention */
> > > +wm 32 0x30360388 0x40000000
> > > +wm 32 0x30360384 0x40000000
> > > +
> > > +wm 32 0x30391000 0x00000002
> > > +wm 32 0x307a0000 0x01040001
> > 
> > 
> > Uwe posted a patch the other day to replace all these
> > constants with defines across the tree.
> > Looks like a step backward to introduce a new file where this approach is not used.
> 
> Uwes patch replaces raw values in the i.MX6 files (where we have defines
> for the registers). This is a new i.MX7 board, where no such defines
> exists for now.
OK, I had missed that "little" detail.
> 
> I'm not saying that we shouldn't try to do the same thing for i.MX7, but
> it is considerably more work than for MX6.
Nice janitorial task for someone.

	Sam