[PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: socfpga: dtsi: add dw-wdt reset lines

[Sascha Hauer]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:58:56AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:12:07PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:50 +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar at pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > index d16758fdab46..66d7f21dc6a3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > @@ -49,3 +49,13 @@
> > >  &f2s_sdram_ref_clk {
> > >  	clock-frequency = <0>;
> > >  };
> > > +
> > > +&watchdog0 {
> > > +	resets = <&rst L4WD0_RESET>;
> > > +	reset-names = "dw-wdt";
> > 
> > This is the official binding?  The reset-names property is supposed to
> > be the name of the reset from the perspective of the device being
> > described, e.g. the watchdog.  Not the name from the perspective of the
> > reset controller.  Rather than "dw-wdt", the name should something like
> > "reset", which clearly doesn't add much information, which is why the
> > reset-names property is supposed to be optional.
> > 
> 
> There is no "official" binding. I wasn't really sure about this property
> and just tried to derive from other bindings. I don't care for this one,
> so I'm okay with removing it.

Could you send a fixup patch for this?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |