[PATCH 1/5] usb: ehci-hcd: port periodic transactions implementation from the u-boot
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Mon Sep 21 23:31:35 PDT 2015
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:30:45PM +0300, Peter Mamonov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Mamonov <pmamonov at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 400 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/usb/host/ehci.h | 15 +-
> 2 files changed, 413 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> }
>
> static int
> +disable_periodic(struct ehci_priv *ehci)
> +{
> + uint32_t cmd;
> + struct ehci_hcor *hcor = ehci->hcor;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cmd = ehci_readl(&hcor->or_usbcmd);
> + cmd &= ~CMD_PSE;
> + ehci_writel(&hcor->or_usbcmd, cmd);
> +
> + ret = handshake((uint32_t *)&hcor->or_usbsts,
> + STS_PSS, 0, 100 * 1000);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + printf("EHCI failed: timeout when disabling periodic list\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define NEXT_QH(qh) (struct QH *)((0xa0000000 | (unsigned long)hc32_to_cpu((qh)->qh_link)) & ~0x1f)
Ok, here's the reason it doesn't work on Arm. The 0xa0000000 is probably
due to the cached/uncached address conversion on Mips. Without the
0a0000000 this patch works fine on Arm.
> +
> +static int
> +enable_periodic(struct ehci_priv *ehci)
> +{
> + uint32_t cmd;
> + struct ehci_hcor *hcor = ehci->hcor;
> + int ret;
> + uint64_t start;
> +
> + cmd = ehci_readl(&hcor->or_usbcmd);
> + cmd |= CMD_PSE;
> + ehci_writel(&hcor->or_usbcmd, cmd);
> +
> + ret = handshake((uint32_t *)&hcor->or_usbsts,
> + STS_PSS, STS_PSS, 100 * 1000);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + printf("EHCI failed: timeout when enabling periodic list\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + start = get_time_ns();
> + while(!is_timeout_non_interruptible(start, 1 * MSECOND));
mdelay_non_interruptible?
> +static int ehci_destroy_int_queue(struct usb_device *dev,
> + struct int_queue *queue)
> +{
> + int result = -EINVAL;
> + struct usb_host *host = dev->host;
> + struct ehci_priv *ehci = to_ehci(host);
> + struct QH *cur = ehci->periodic_queue;
> + uint64_t start;
> +
> + if (disable_periodic(ehci) < 0) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "FATAL: periodic should never fail, but did\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ehci->periodic_schedules--;
> +
> + start = get_time_ns();
> + while (!(cur->qh_link & cpu_to_hc32(QH_LINK_TERMINATE))) {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev,
> + "considering %p, with qh_link %x\n",
> + cur, cur->qh_link);
> + if (NEXT_QH(cur) == queue->first) {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev,
> + "found candidate. removing from chain\n");
> + cur->qh_link = queue->last->qh_link;
> + result = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + cur = NEXT_QH(cur);
> + if (is_timeout_non_interruptible(start, 500 * MSECOND)) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "Timeout destroying interrupt endpoint queue\n");
> + result = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (ehci->periodic_schedules > 0) {
> + result = enable_periodic(ehci);
> + if (result < 0)
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "FATAL: periodic should never fail, but did");
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + free(queue->tds);
> + free(queue->first);
You have to use dma_free_coherent here.
> + free(queue);
> +
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> submit_int_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned long pipe, void *buffer,
> int length, int interval)
> {
> struct usb_host *host = dev->host;
> struct ehci_priv *ehci = to_ehci(host);
> + struct int_queue *queue;
> + uint64_t start;
> + void *backbuffer;
> + int result = 0, ret;
>
> dev_dbg(ehci->dev, "dev=%p, pipe=%lu, buffer=%p, length=%d, interval=%d",
> dev, pipe, buffer, length, interval);
> - return -1;
> +
> + queue = ehci_create_int_queue(dev, pipe, 1, length, buffer, interval);
> + if (!queue)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + start = get_time_ns();
> + while ((backbuffer = ehci_poll_int_queue(dev, queue)) == NULL)
> + if (is_timeout_non_interruptible(start,
> + USB_CNTL_TIMEOUT * MSECOND)) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "Timeout poll on interrupt endpoint\n");
> + result = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (backbuffer != buffer) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "got wrong buffer back (%p instead of %p)\n",
> + backbuffer, buffer);
> + return -EINVAL;
Shouldn't we call ehci_destroy_int_queue() here aswell? Otherwise we
leak the memory allocated from ehci_create_int_queue().
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list