sp uninitialized in imx6_cpu_lowlevel_init
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Sun Jan 18 23:30:21 PST 2015
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:27:28PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when building imx_v7_defconfig and then looking at
> images/start_imx6_gk802.pbl (several more are affected, too), I get:
>
> $ objdump -d images/start_imx6_gk802.pbl
> 00000000 <start_imx6_gk802>:
> 0: e28f9001 add r9, pc, #1
> 4: e12fff19 bx r9
> 8: f000 f822 bl 50 <start_imx6_gk802+0x50>
> ...
> 50: f000 f850 bl f4 <__start_imx6_gk802>
> ...
> f4: f000 f80c bl 110 <imx6_cpu_lowlevel_init>
> ...
> 110: b508 push {r3, lr}
>
> That is the sp register is used here without being initialized. I guess
> this didn't break up to now because when barebox is jumped into, sp
> was already used by the boot rom and still points into SRAM.
>
> Still I think this is worth to be fixed. I think this means that
> imx6_cpu_lowlevel_init must be marked __naked and lr must be saved into
> a register that is preserved by the functions called by
> imx6_cpu_lowlevel_init.
>
> Sounds reasonable?
I think we should rather setup a stack before calling
imx6_cpu_lowlevel_init. We have SRAM for that so we can use it.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list