Devicetree Maintenance in barebox
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Mon Feb 17 14:42:15 EST 2014
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:13:32AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It's becoming more obvious that devicetree maintenance is painful
> because we have to sync them to the kernel regularly. My hope was that
> this would get simpler once the devicetrees get their own repository
> outside the kernel, but it seems that won't happen anytime soon.
As one of my todo items from last week's devicetree irc meeting, I've
now proposed just that:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.devicetree.compiler/14
Also, cross-posted to devicetree and devicetree-spec.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the barebox
mailing list