[PATCH v2] imx6: Add support for phyCARD-i.MX6

Christian Hemp c.hemp at phytec.de
Wed Apr 30 07:15:14 PDT 2014


Hello Sascha,

Am Mittwoch, den 30.04.2014, 14:52 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:15:29PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:07:32 +0200 от Christian Hemp <c.hemp at phytec.de>:
> > > Add support for Phytec phyCARD-i.MX6.
> > > 	- 1GB RAM on two banks
> > > 	- 1GB RAM on one bank
> > > 	- 2GB RAM on two banks
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp <c.hemp at phytec.de>
> > ...
> > > +static int phytec_pcaaxl3_core_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (!of_machine_is_compatible("phytec,imx6q-pcaaxl3"))
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	imx6_init_lowlevel();
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > 
> > This can be easy:
> > if (of_machine_is_compatible("phytec,imx6q-pcaaxl3"))
> >   imx6_init_lowlevel();
> > return 0;
> 
> I think Christians version is fine. The way Christian did it more
> functionality can be added to phytec_pcaaxl3_core_init without
> restructuring it.
> 
> > 
> > ...
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycard-imx6/lowlevel.c
> > ...
> > > +static inline void setup_uart(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	void __iomem *ccmbase = (void *)MX6_CCM_BASE_ADDR;
> > 
> > = IOMEM(MX6_CCM_BASE_ADDR);
> > and so on...

Should I leave it as it is or change it to Alexanders version?


Christian

> > 
> > ...
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> > > index 58dc38b..63fe854 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_IMX6) += imx6q-gk802.dtb \
> > >  	imx6q-nitrogen6x.dtb \
> > >  	imx6dl-nitrogen6x.dtb \
> > >  	imx6q-udoo.dtb \
> > > -	imx6q-var-custom.dtb
> > > +	imx6q-var-custom.dtb \
> > 
> > Let's use *-bb.dtb as other boards.
> 
> Hm, now that we have the upstream dts files in barebox all files in
> arch/arm/dts/ are barebox specific, no?
> 
> Sascha
> 





More information about the barebox mailing list