[PATCH 2/2 v2] fs: add BPKFS support
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Tue Sep 24 12:30:28 EDT 2013
On 17:28 Tue 24 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 11:33 Tue 24 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:24:50AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > On 09:32 Tue 24 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > > Some typos inside
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 04:54:16PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > > > Simple update file format developped for Somfy, tools and library are
> > > > >
> > > > > s/developped/developed/
> > > > >
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2013 Jean-Chritstophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > s/Jean-Chritstophe/Jean-Christophe/
> > > >
> > > > a tyPo in my own name :(
> > > > >
> > > > > Otherwise this looks good.
> > > >
> > > > for some times I was thinking to do the same on uimage
> > > >
> > > > so we do not need to extract struff from it
> > >
> > > I have a patch that drops multifile uImage support. It really makes the
> > > bootm code more readable.
> >
> > NO I does use it and in production board
> >
> > we must have multifile uImage support
>
> That was in response to "I was thinking to do the same on uimage" which
> I interpreted in the way that you thought about implementing uimage
> support as filesystem which would allow us to remove the multifile
> support from bootm without loosing the feature of handling multifile
> images.
yes I was thinking of droping all the bootm uImage bla bla code and use an
ioctl to get the metadata
and I do agree this will simplify the bootm code
Best Regards,
J.
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list