[PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: zynq: Add new architecture zynq
Steffen Trumtrar
s.trumtrar at pengutronix.de
Tue Mar 19 09:31:19 EDT 2013
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:18:02AM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:21:57AM +0100, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > Add basic support for the Xilinx Zynq-7000 EPP architecture.
> > The Zynq-7000 is an embedded processing platform that combines a Cortex A9
> > dualcore MPSoC with an Artix-7 FPGA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> [..]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq-flash-header.h b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq-flash-header.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..a0251cb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq-flash-header.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> > +#ifndef __MACH_FLASH_HEADER_H
> > +#define __MACH_FLASH_HEADER_H
> > +
> > +#include <asm-generic/sections.h>
> > +
> > +#define __flash_header_start __section(.flash_header_start)
> > +
> > +#define __flash_header_section __section(.flash_header_0x0)
> > +#define __ps7reg_entry_section __section(.ps7reg_entry_0x0A0)
> > +#define __image_len_section __section(.image_len_0x08c0)
> > +#define FLASH_HEADER_OFFSET 0x0
> > +#define IMAGE_OFFSET 0x8c0
> > +
> > +#define DEST_BASE 0x8c0
> > +#define FLASH_HEADER_BASE (DEST_BASE + FLASH_HEADER_OFFSET)
> > +
> > +struct zynq_reg_entry {
> > + __le32 addr;
> > + __le32 val;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define WIDTH_DETECTION_MAGIC 0xAA995566
> > +#define IMAGE_IDENTIFICATION 0x584C4E58 /* "XLNX" */
> > +
> > +struct zynq_flash_header {
> > + uint32_t width_det;
> > + uint32_t image_id;
> > + uint32_t enc_stat;
> > + uint32_t user;
> > + uint32_t flash_offset;
> > + uint32_t length;
> > + uint32_t res0;
> > + uint32_t start_of_exec;
> > + uint32_t total_len;
> > + uint32_t res1;
> > + uint32_t checksum;
> > + uint32_t res2;
> > +};
>
> Did you disagree with my suggestion last time around of merging the
> flash_header and ps7reg_entry sections? At the very least, it seems
> inconsistent that the zynq_reg_entrys have type __le32, and the members
> of zynq_flash_header are uint32_t (even though they have the same
> endianness requirement).
Actually, I seem to have missed that comment.
The types should be the same. Yes. I have to fix that.
>
> I still maintain you should move the REG macro currently in the board
> flash_header.c here.
>
Hm, ok. I will do that.
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list