Re[2]: New dt-only arm/mach

Alexander Shiyan shc_work at
Wed Mar 13 00:39:25 EDT 2013

> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:50:26PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > I think about dtb-file in /env, but not sure... Thanks.
> > > 
> > > It can be done as well I guess, but that doesn't sound that familiar
> > > from what I've seen in the other barebox boards.
> > 
> > Kernel no contain any board for mach-sunxi.
> > This mean than all stuff is described via DT.
> > In the barebox we should have "mach" & "board", so I think we
> > should create empty (fake) board for architectures like this.
> > Any other opinions?
> Where would you put the SDRAM setup then?

I do not know yet :) Development at planning stage. There are many
questions that I am trying to solve. It seems that in order to start, I make
a fixed load initially, and then I will try to use the options from DT.

> I think it shouldn't be a problem to change barebox to compile
> without a board directory if you really don't need one, but I assume
> some board specific code will be left.


More information about the barebox mailing list