[PATCH 5/7] smc911x: improve detection handle
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Wed Aug 29 04:36:07 EDT 2012
On 08:52 Wed 29 Aug , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 07:06:16AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > detect if the bus is swapped and report a 32bit drivers is used on a 16bit bus
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/smc911x.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/smc911x.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> > index 75a332e..17f365d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> > @@ -470,9 +470,27 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> > }
> >
> > val = smc911x_reg_read(priv, BYTE_TEST);
> > - if(val != 0x87654321) {
> > + if (val == 0x43218765) {
> > + dev_info(dev, "BYTE_TEST looks swapped, "
> > + "applying WORD_SWAP");
>
> dev_dbg please. Users shouldn't be interested in this.
>
> > + smc911x_reg_write(priv, WORD_SWAP, 0xffffffff);
> > +
> > + /* 1 dummy read of BYTE_TEST is needed after a write to
> > + * WORD_SWAP before its contents are valid */
> > + val = smc911x_reg_read(priv, BYTE_TEST);
> > +
> > + val = smc911x_reg_read(priv, BYTE_TEST);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (val != 0x87654321) {
> > dev_err(dev, "no smc911x found on 0x%p (byte_test=0x%08x)\n",
> > priv->base, val);
> > + if (((val >> 16) & 0xFFFF) == (val & 0xFFFF)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "top 16 bits equal to bottom 16 bits\n");
> > + dev_err(dev,
> > + "This may mean the chip is set "
> > + "for 32 bit while the bus is reading 16 bit\n");
>
> Please replace the second dev_err with a comment in the source code.
> This is developer information only; developers will grep for the source
> of the message anyway.
code from the kernel prefer to keep it as is
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the barebox
mailing list