[PATCH 2/5] globalvar: add support to set a value to of all globalvars beginning with 'match'

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 11:08 Fri 24 Aug     , Roberto Nibali wrote:
> Hi
> 
> >  commands/global.c   |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  common/globalvar.c  |   10 +++++++++
> >  include/globalvar.h |    3 +++
> >  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/commands/global.c b/commands/global.c
> > index de6b13e..cb22e63 100644
> > --- a/commands/global.c
> > +++ b/commands/global.c
> > @@ -24,25 +24,26 @@
> >  #include <command.h>
> >  #include <globalvar.h>
> >  #include <environment.h>
> > +#include <getopt.h>
> >
> > -static int do_global(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +static int do_global_add(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  {
> >         int ret;
> >         char *value;
> >
> > -       if (argc != 2)
> > +       if (argc != 1)
> >                 return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE;
> >
> > -       value = strchr(argv[1], '=');
> > +       value = strchr(argv[0], '=');
> >         if (value) {
> >                 *value = 0;
> >                 value++;
> >         }
> >
> > -       ret = globalvar_add_simple(argv[1]);
> > +       ret = globalvar_add_simple(argv[0]);
> >
> >         if (value) {
> > -               char *name = asprintf("global.%s", argv[1]);
> > +               char *name = asprintf("global.%s", argv[0]);
> >                 ret = setenv(name, value);
> >                 free(name);
> >         }
> > @@ -50,13 +51,56 @@ static int do_global(int argc, char *argv[])
> >         return ret ? 1 : 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int do_global_reset(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > +       char *value;
> > +
> > +       if (argc != 1)
> > +               return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE;
> > +
> > +       value = strchr(argv[0], '=');
> > +       if (value) {
> > +               *value = 0;
> > +               value++;
> > +       } else {
> > +               value = "";
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       globalvar_reset_match(argv[0], value);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_global(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > +       int opt;
> > +       int do_reset = 0;
> > +
> > +       while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "r")) > 0) {
> > +               switch (opt) {
> > +               case 'r':
> > +                       do_reset = 1;
> > +                       break;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       argc -= optind;
> > +       argv += optind;
> > +
> > +       if (do_reset)
> > +               return do_global_reset(argc, argv);
> 
> Since I just read the diff, I might fail to see the big picture,
> however, where's the call to globalvar_reset_match(), is it inside
> do_global_reset()?
no can not

you do this

globalvar toto.l=t
globalvar toto=a

so you expect 

global.toto.l=t
global.toto=a

and if we you the reset_match

you will have 
global.toto.l=a
global.toto=a

> 
> > +       return do_global_add(argc, argv);
> > +}
> > +
> >  BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_START(global)
> > -BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_USAGE("global <var>[=<value]\n")
> > +BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_USAGE("global [-r] <var>[=<value]\n")
> >  BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_SHORT("add a new global variable named <var>, optionally set to <value>\n")
> > +BAREBOX_CMD_HELP_SHORT("-r to set a value to of all globalvars beginning with 'match'")
> 
> Shouldn't this be REset instead of set? How about:
> 
> "-r to reset all matching global variables to a value."
> 
> Maybe giving an example could shed some light on the exact syntax of
> the exact kind of matching you had in mind.
it's realy set a value to a list of params

the text in english is clear

Best Regards,
J.