[PATCH v2 1/2] debug_ll.h: add PUTS_LL() function
Franck JULLIEN
franck.jullien at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 09:14:03 EDT 2011
2011/7/18 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:06:09PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov at gmail.com>
>
> Applied both to next.
>
> Thanks
> Sascha
>
>> ---
>> include/debug_ll.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/debug_ll.h b/include/debug_ll.h
>> index e99ae7d..6b1b174 100644
>> --- a/include/debug_ll.h
>> +++ b/include/debug_ll.h
>> @@ -35,9 +35,22 @@
>> ch = ((v >> (i*4)) & 0xf);\
>> ch += (ch >= 10) ? 'a' - 10 : '0';\
>> PUTC_LL (ch); }})
>> +
>> +static __inline__ void PUTS_LL(char * str)
>> +{
>> + while (*str) {
>> + if (*str == '\n') {
>> + PUTC_LL('\r');
>> + }
>> + PUTC_LL(*str);
>> + str++;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> #else
>> # define PUTC_LL(c) do {} while (0)
>> # define PUTHEX_LL(v) do {} while (0)
>> +# define PUTS_LL(c) do {} while (0)
>>
>> #endif
>>
Is there any reason for not using vsprintf in a printf_ll function
which would use puts_ll / putc_ll ??
Franck.
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> barebox mailing list
>> barebox at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>>
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
More information about the barebox
mailing list