problem in serial_ns16550.c
Antony Pavlov
antonynpavlov at gmail.com
Wed Aug 3 11:35:18 EDT 2011
Hi!
IMHO there is a problem in ns16550_probe() (see
drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c:243).
There is the construction:
------
if (!(dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK) &&
((plat->reg_read == NULL) || (plat->reg_write == NULL)))
return -EINVAL;
------
Imagine creation of typical serial port:
------
static struct NS16550_plat plat = {
.clock = 1843200,
};
...
add_ns16550_device(-1, UART_ADDR, 8, IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT, &plat);
------
Here we have plat.reg_read == NULL, plat.reg_write == NULL.
Usage of add_ns16550_device will make
dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK == IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT.
But take into account this (see include/linux/ioport.h):
------
#define IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK (3<<3)
#define IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT (0<<3)
------
So IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT == 0 (sic!)
A son tour, !(dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK) give
true, if flags select IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT.
As a result, if add_ns16550_device() take IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT, and
plat->reg_read == NULL, plat->reg_write == NULL then ns16550_probe()
will return -EINVAL.
--
Best regards,
Antony Pavlov
More information about the barebox
mailing list