s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Nov 17 04:11:02 EST 2010
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:20:47PM +0100, Belisko Marek wrote:
> barebox compilation with C=1 produce a lot of sparse warnings.
> Mainly concerning __iomem problems with readb() and similar functions.
> Make it sense to take care or just could be omitted?
I think it makes sense to work on this. Then we can see the useful
warnings buried under the __iomem warnings.
I had the idea of adding a
#define IOMEM(addr) ((void __force __iomem *)(addr))
and use it where appropriate.
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox