[PATCHv2] Add dynamic video initialization to barebox
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Nov 17 03:43:22 EST 2010
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:57:01AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > > Currently barebox uses a fixed videomode setup. Everything is compiled
> > > in. This change adds the possibility to select a videomode according to a
> > > connected display at runtime. The current behaviour is still present if
> > > not otherwise configured. If configured for runtime setup, initialization
> > > of the video hardware will be delayed until the required videomode will
> > > be selected from the shell code. If more than one videomode is supported
> > > by the platform, running the 'devinfo' command on the framebuffer device
> > > shows the supported videomode list. After selecting the videomode, the
> > > output can be enabled.
> > General remarks about this series:
> > - Please do not add code with '#if 0' and activate it later. This shows
> > the series has the wrong order.
> This was for review only. If I would change the code in one step, the patch is
> > - Please refrain from basing your internal functions around 'struct
> > device_d'. By doing so we completey lose type safety and at least in
> > case of the mci framework where three different devices are involved
> > this leads to unreadable and error prone code.
> But IMHO in the case of the MCI there _are_ three devices!
> - The one that knows how to handle disk drives
> - The one that knows what a SD card is
> - the one that knows how to transfer data from an to an attached device.
> Why this is unreadable or error prone? If you combine all these different
> functions into one I would say: Yes, the result is unreadable and error
> prone. And if you would say for a bootloader this separate approach is
> over-engineered, I would say: Maybe.
I'm not at all against the presence of three devices. It's only a bad
idea to use the struct device_d * as a reference between functions. In
the MCI framework all functions take some device and then the
platform_data is derefenced to three different struct types. How do I
know which of the three devices is passed there? I have to look at the
calling function figure this out. We can simply let the compiler barf
when somebody passes a wrong pointer type when we do it like we always
did: Just pass a struct mci_host or whatever around.
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox