[PATCH] b43: treat LCNXN-PHY as extra N-PHY devices

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 30 June 2014 12:54, Arend van Spriel <arend at broadcom.com> wrote:
> On 29-06-14 21:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> LCNXN is simply a continuation of N, e.g. code handling LCNXN revs 0 and
>> 1 is mostly the same as for N-PHY revs 7+.
>
> Hi Rafał,
>
> LCNXN is actually a LCN phy with 2 streams (mimo).

Err, I don't think so. Could you take a closer look at this? I'm
pretty sure LCNXN is continuation of N.

Maybe you were thinking about LCN40? I don't know much about LCN40,
maybe it's a variation of LCN?