[PATCH] ssb: Convert to use crc8 code in kernel library

[Larry Finger]

On 10/09/2011 03:48 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2011/10/9 Michael Büsch<m at bues.ch>:
>> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:28:42 -0500
>> Larry Finger<Larry.Finger at lwfinger.net>  wrote:
>>
>>> The kernel now contains library routines to establish crc8 tables and
>>> to calculate the appropriate sums. Use them for ssb.
>>
>>> +static u8 srom_crc8_table[CRC8_TABLE_SIZE];
>>> +
>>> +/* Polynomial:   x^8 + x^7 + x^6 + x^4 + x^2 + 1   */
>>> +#define SROM_CRC8_POLY       0xAB
>>> +
>>> +static inline void ltoh16_buf(u16 *buf, unsigned int size)
>>>   {
>>> +     size /= 2;
>>> +     while (size--)
>>> +             *(buf + size) = le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)(buf + size));
>>> +}
>>>
>>> -     return crc;
>>> +static inline void htol16_buf(u16 *buf, unsigned int size)
>>> +{
>>> +     size /= 2;
>>> +     while (size--)
>>> +             *(__le16 *)(buf + size) = cpu_to_le16(*(buf + size));
>>>   }
>>
>>>                return -ENOMEM;
>>> +     crc8_populate_lsb(srom_crc8_table, SROM_CRC8_POLY);
>>>        bus->sprom_size = SSB_SPROMSIZE_WORDS_R123;
>>>        sprom_do_read(bus, buf);
>>> +     /* convert to le */
>>> +     htol16_buf(buf, 2 * bus->sprom_size);
>>
>>>                bus->sprom_size = SSB_SPROMSIZE_WORDS_R4;
>>>                sprom_do_read(bus, buf);
>>> +             htol16_buf(buf, 2 * bus->sprom_size);
>>>                err = sprom_check_crc(buf, bus->sprom_size);
>>
>>> +     /* restore endianess */
>>> +     ltoh16_buf(buf, 2 * bus->sprom_size);
>>>        err = sprom_extract(bus, sprom, buf, bus->sprom_size);
>>
>> This endianness stuff is _really_ ugly.
>> Does this patch decrease the code size, at least? I'll almost doubt it.
>> If it doesn't, why are we actually doing this?
>> It doesn't even decrease the .data size. Worse, it converts a .const
>> table to a .data table.
>>
>> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Agree. I already tried converting bcma to use crc8:
> [RFC][WORTH IT?][PATCH] bcma: make use of crc8 lib
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/b43-dev/2011-June/001466.html
>
> But resigned, it was introducing some hacks or not optimal ops, I
> decided it's not worth it.
>
> Even Arend said their brcm80211 is hacky about crc8 usage:
>
> W dniu 15 czerwca 2011 21:26 użytkownik Arend van Spriel
> <arend at broadcom.com>  napisał:
>> Agree. In brcm80211 we convert the entire sprom, calculate, and convert it
>> back. Also not perfect I think as it loops over de sprom data twice.

John,

Please drop this patch. The amount of code churning is not worth the 100 byte 
saving in the size of the generated code.

Larry