[PATCH 2/9] b43: add bus device abstraction layer
zajec5 at gmail.com
Wed May 18 03:01:30 EDT 2011
W dniu 18 maja 2011 02:28 użytkownik Julian Calaby
<julian.calaby at gmail.com> napisał:
> A quick question:
> 2011/5/18 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com>:
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com>
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h | 4 +++-
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Would it make more sense to have this be called ssb.c as it contains
> all the ssb specific functions,
It's only ssb specific for now. It will contain BCMA code later.
> that way you can then have an brcma.c
> file to contain the functions specific to that bus?
I'll put BCMA specific code in bus.c.
Right now bus.c contains 100 LOC* and I believe its SSB part is
complete. All the ops functions are one liners. It's so small and
simple file I don't see sense to splitting it and having more mess in
list of files instead.
A one quick question:
Why didn't you respond in "[RFC][PATCH] b43: add bus abstraction
layer" on 2011-04-08? Or more recent "[RFC ONLY 2/5] b43: add bus
device abstraction later" posted on 2011-05-09?
* 100 LOC without GPL header, but including /includes/ and empty lines.
More information about the b43-dev