[PATCH 2/2] b43: implement timeouts workaround

[Larry Finger]

On 05/11/2011 07:31 AM, Michael Büsch wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 07:17 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 02:35 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> W dniu 11 maja 2011 02:12 użytkownik Larry Finger
>>> <Larry.Finger at lwfinger.net>   napisał:
>>>> On 05/10/2011 06:56 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> W dniu 11 maja 2011 01:42 użytkownik Larry Finger
>>>>> <Larry.Finger at lwfinger.net>     napisał:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/10/2011 07:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Documented in:<4BB81CAD.10602 at lwfinger.net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This reference is not correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch, GMail seems to lie to me. Any change you can give me real message id
>>>>> of:
>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/b43-dev@lists.infradead.org/msg00049.html
>>>>
>>>> This one is good.
>>>
>>> Sorry, do you mean<4BB81CAD.10602 at lwfinger.net>   is OK? Or should I
>>> use link I posted instead of message ID? Or do you know how to get
>>> message ID from the link above?
>>>
>>
>> Use the link
>> "http://www.mail-archive.com/b43-dev@lists.infradead.org/msg00049.html".
>> <4BB81CAD.10602 at lwfinger.net>  just points to a non-existent email address on my
>> domain. I don't know how to get a message ID.
>
> It's just an email header added by your MUA.
> For example:   Message-ID:<4DCA7E40.9070709 at lwfinger.net>
>
> The advantage of this is that links change and vanish. However, message
> IDs don't. The message ID uniquely identifies a message, regardless of
> where it's stored. So even if the mail archive moves to another URL,
> it's still possible to find the actual mail by the ID.

Ahh. Yes, that Message ID is correct. I just rechecked the header in the mail 
that I sent. Sorry for the confusion and noise.

Larry