Notes on ssb specs and implementation

[Michael Büsch]

On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 21:00 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: 
> Michael: was there any reasons why we didn't implement some parts of
> core-disabling code?

The function are complete as of latest reverse engineering efforts.
Broadcom added stuff, if they do more stuff in latest code.

> Michael: should we care about the way wl sets core specific flags? I
> didn't dig into that moment in MMIO dumps, but as ssb_device_enable
> implementation ignores flags at the end, it has to set flags somehow
> differently on it's own.

I have no idea. ssb_device_enable is very hairy and I'm not going
to touch it without good reason and regression testing.

You didn't tell us the important part: Does changing ssb_device_enable
make it work?

-- 
Greetings Michael.