Licensing wlc_phy_radio.h and brcm80211 (was: [PATCH 3/3] b43: N-PHY: add 2055 radio regs)

Rafał Miłecki zajec5 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 13:06:00 EDT 2010


2010/10/14 Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de>:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:40:14PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> W dniu 11 października 2010 18:24 użytkownik Gábor Stefanik
>> <netrolller.3d at gmail.com> napisał:
>> > Doesn't brcm80211 contain register names for B2055?
>>
>> I've checked brcm80211 and noticed defines in
>> drivers/staging/brcm80211/phy/wlc_phy_radio.h.
>>
>> Whole brcm80211 driver is licensed as:
>> MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
>>
>> Mentioned file contains following comments:
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2010 Broadcom Corporation
>> + *
>> + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
>> + * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>> + * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>>
>> Our b43 driver is licensed as:
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> and I am not sure if permission above is actually GPL-compatible. The
>> best option would be to add defines from wlc_phy_radio.h and include
>> Broadcom's copyright. However comment above wants us to include info
>> about free copying/modifying/using which is not GPL-compatible.
>>
>> Is there any way to solve this issue?
>
> I don't understand, are you just wanting to use the names in the .h file
> for the registers?

Yes. I want to put lines like:
#define RADIO_2056_RX0				(0x6 << 12)
in my radio_2056.h


> If so, why?  You don't want to support the same devices in the b43
> driver that the brcm80211 driver does, do you?

I do. I see many advantages of that plus most of the code is already
here coming from RE.

Finishing N-PHY support in b43 does not need much work plus:
1) We support SSB devices
2) We support older (LP/G-phy) devices
3) We share infrastructure (easier to maintain)
4) We probably could support modes like AP

-- 
Rafał



More information about the b43-dev mailing list