[PATCH v3 09/13] wifi: ath12k: subscribe required word mask from rx tlv

[Kalle Valo]

Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag at quicinc.com> writes:

> From: Karthikeyan Kathirvel <quic_kathirve at quicinc.com>
>
> Most of the RX descriptors fields are currently not used in the
> ath12k driver. Hence add support to selectively subscribe to the
> required quad words (64 bits) within msdu_end and mpdu_start of
> rx_desc.
>
> Add compact rx_desc structures and configure the bit mask for Rx TLVs
> (msdu_end, mpdu_start, mpdu_end) via registers. With these registers
> SW can configure to DMA the partial TLV struct to Rx buffer.
>
> Each TLV type has its own register to configure the mask value.
> The mask value configured in register will indicate if a particular
> QWORD has to be written to rx buffer or not i.e., if Nth bit is enabled
> in the mask Nth QWORD will be written and it will not be written if the
> bit is disabled in mask. While 0th bit indicates whether TLV tag will be
> written or not.
>
> Advantages of Qword subscription of TLVs
> - Avoid multiple cache-line misses as the all the required fields
> of the TLV are within 128 bytes.
> - Memory optimization as TLVs + DATA + SHINFO can fit in 2k buffer
> even for 64 bit kernel.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.1.1-00188-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Kathirvel <quic_kathirve at quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag at quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag at quicinc.com>

[...]

> +static void
> +ath12k_hw_qcn9274_compact_rx_desc_set_msdu_len(struct hal_rx_desc *desc, u16 len)
> +{
> +	u32 info = __le32_to_cpu(desc->u.qcn9274_compact.msdu_end.info10);
> +
> +	info = u32_replace_bits(info, len, RX_MSDU_END_INFO10_MSDU_LENGTH);
> +	desc->u.qcn9274_compact.msdu_end.info10 = __cpu_to_le32(info);
> +}

Don't we have le32_replace_bits()? That would simplify this function.

No need to resend because of this, but a followup patch cleaning this up
would be nice.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches