[PATCH 24/50] wifi: ath12k: add hal_tx.c

Karthikeyan Periyasamy (QUIC) quic_periyasa at quicinc.com
Tue Oct 4 04:20:19 PDT 2022


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson at quicinc.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 10:51 PM
> To: Kalle Valo <kvalo at kernel.org>; linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: ath12k at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/50] wifi: ath12k: add hal_tx.c
> 
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary
> of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
> 
> On 8/12/2022 9:09 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > From: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo at quicinc.com>
> >
> > (Patches split into one patch per file for easier review, but the
> > final commit will be one big patch. See the cover letter for more
> > info.)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo at quicinc.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal_tx.c | 137
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal_tx.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal_tx.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ac6f83ec06c2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal_tx.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2021-2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights
> reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "hal_desc.h"
> > +#include "hal.h"
> > +#include "hal_tx.h"
> > +#include "hif.h"
> > +
> > +#define DSCP_TID_MAP_TBL_ENTRY_SIZE 64
> > +
> > +/* dscp_tid_map - Default DSCP-TID mapping
> > + *
> > + * DSCP        TID
> > + * 000000      0
> 
> this comment confused me more than it helped me IMO this would be a
> much better comment like:
>   * 000xxx      0
> 

Sure will address this comment in the next version of the patch

> > + * 001000      1
> > + * 010000      2
> > + * 011000      3
> > + * 100000      4
> > + * 101000      5
> > + * 110000      6
> > + * 111000      7
> > + */
> > +static const u8 dscp_tid_map[DSCP_TID_MAP_TBL_ENTRY_SIZE] = {
> > +     0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > +     1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > +     2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2,
> > +     3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
> > +     4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4,
> > +     5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5,
> > +     6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,
> > +     7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7,
> > +};
> 
> is a lookup table "better" than a simple:
> static inline u8 dscp2tid(u8 dscp)
> {
>         return dscp >> 3;
> }
> 

Sure will address this comment in the next version of the patch

> > +
> > +void ath12k_hal_tx_cmd_desc_setup(struct ath12k_base *ab,
> > +                               struct hal_tcl_data_cmd *tcl_cmd,
> > +                               struct hal_tx_info *ti) {
> > +     tcl_cmd->buf_addr_info.info0 =
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->paddr, BUFFER_ADDR_INFO0_ADDR);
> > +     tcl_cmd->buf_addr_info.info1 =
> > +             le32_encode_bits(((uint64_t)ti->paddr >>
> HAL_ADDR_MSB_REG_SHIFT),
> > +                              BUFFER_ADDR_INFO1_ADDR);
> > +     tcl_cmd->buf_addr_info.info1 |=
> > +             le32_encode_bits((ti->rbm_id),
> BUFFER_ADDR_INFO1_RET_BUF_MGR) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->desc_id,
> > +BUFFER_ADDR_INFO1_SW_COOKIE);
> > +
> > +     tcl_cmd->info0 =
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->type,
> HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO0_DESC_TYPE) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->bank_id,
> > + HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO0_BANK_ID);
> > +
> > +     tcl_cmd->info1 =
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->meta_data_flags,
> > +                              HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO1_CMD_NUM);
> > +
> > +     tcl_cmd->info2 = cpu_to_le32(ti->flags0) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->data_len,
> HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO2_DATA_LEN) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->pkt_offset,
> > + HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO2_PKT_OFFSET);
> > +
> > +     tcl_cmd->info3 = cpu_to_le32(ti->flags1) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->tid, HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO3_TID) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->lmac_id,
> HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO3_PMAC_ID) |
> > +             le32_encode_bits(ti->vdev_id,
> > + HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO3_VDEV_ID);
> > +
> > +     tcl_cmd->info4 = le32_encode_bits(ti->bss_ast_idx,
> > +                                       HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO4_SEARCH_INDEX) |
> > +                      le32_encode_bits(ti->bss_ast_hash,
> > +                                       HAL_TCL_DATA_CMD_INFO4_CACHE_SET_NUM);
> > +     tcl_cmd->info5 = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void ath12k_hal_tx_set_dscp_tid_map(struct ath12k_base *ab, int id) {
> > +     u32 ctrl_reg_val;
> > +     u32 addr;
> > +     u8 hw_map_val[HAL_DSCP_TID_TBL_SIZE];
> > +     int i;
> > +     u32 value;
> > +     int cnt = 0;
> > +
> > +     ctrl_reg_val = ath12k_hif_read32(ab,
> HAL_SEQ_WCSS_UMAC_TCL_REG +
> > +                                      HAL_TCL1_RING_CMN_CTRL_REG);
> > +     /* Enable read/write access */
> > +     ctrl_reg_val |=
> HAL_TCL1_RING_CMN_CTRL_DSCP_TID_MAP_PROG_EN;
> > +     ath12k_hif_write32(ab, HAL_SEQ_WCSS_UMAC_TCL_REG +
> > +                        HAL_TCL1_RING_CMN_CTRL_REG, ctrl_reg_val);
> > +
> > +     addr = HAL_SEQ_WCSS_UMAC_TCL_REG +
> HAL_TCL1_RING_DSCP_TID_MAP +
> > +            (4 * id * (HAL_DSCP_TID_TBL_SIZE / 4));
> > +
> > +     /* Configure each DSCP-TID mapping in three bits there by configure
> > +      * three bytes in an iteration.
> > +      */
> > +     for (i = 0; i < DSCP_TID_MAP_TBL_ENTRY_SIZE; i += 8) {
> > +             value = u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP0) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 1],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP1) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 2],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP2) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 3],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP3) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 4],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP4) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 5],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP5) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 6],
> > +                                     HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP6) |
> > +                     u32_encode_bits(dscp_tid_map[i + 7],
> > +
> > + HAL_TCL1_RING_FIELD_DSCP_TID_MAP7);
> > +
> > +             memcpy(&hw_map_val[cnt], &value, 3);
> > +             cnt += 3;
> > +     }
> 
> since everything used to create hw_map_val[] is invariant, why not just have
> a static const array of the final values and get rid of the loop above?
> 

Instead of have final values static we can have the DSCP (Differentiated Services Field Codepoints) to TID mapping as static.
And the final value is derivate based on hardware configuration, so its not scalable in future if some change needs.

> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < HAL_DSCP_TID_TBL_SIZE; i += 4) {
> > +             ath12k_hif_write32(ab, addr, *(u32 *)&hw_map_val[i]);
> > +             addr += 4;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* Disable read/write access */
> > +     ctrl_reg_val = ath12k_hif_read32(ab,
> HAL_SEQ_WCSS_UMAC_TCL_REG +
> > +                                      HAL_TCL1_RING_CMN_CTRL_REG);
> > +     ctrl_reg_val &=
> ~HAL_TCL1_RING_CMN_CTRL_DSCP_TID_MAP_PROG_EN;
> > +     ath12k_hif_write32(ab, HAL_SEQ_WCSS_UMAC_TCL_REG +
> > +                        HAL_TCL1_RING_CMN_CTRL_REG,
> > +                        ctrl_reg_val); }
> > +
> > +void ath12k_hal_tx_configure_bank_register(struct ath12k_base *ab, u32
> bank_config,
> > +                                        u8 bank_id) {
> > +     ath12k_hif_write32(ab, HAL_TCL_SW_CONFIG_BANK_ADDR + 4 *
> bank_id,
> > +                        bank_config); }
> >

Thanks
Karthikeyan


More information about the ath12k mailing list