[PATCH v2 2/4] wifi: ath11k: push MU-MIMO params from hostapd to hardware
Kalle Valo
kvalo at kernel.org
Wed Apr 5 01:19:46 PDT 2023
Kalle Valo <kvalo at kernel.org> writes:
> Robert Marko <robert.marko at sartura.hr> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:45 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> >> @@ -5369,6 +5491,10 @@ static int ath11k_mac_copy_he_cap(struct ath11k *ar,
>>> >>
>>> >> he_cap_elem->mac_cap_info[1] &=
>>> >> IEEE80211_HE_MAC_CAP1_TF_MAC_PAD_DUR_MASK;
>>> >> + he_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] &=
>>> >> + ~IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP0_CHANNEL_WIDTH_SET_160MHZ_IN_5G;
>>> >> + he_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] &=
>>> >> + ~IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP0_CHANNEL_WIDTH_SET_80PLUS80_MHZ_IN_5G;
>>> >
>>> > This is causing a regression for us in OpenWrt at least on IPQ8074 but
>>> > probably on all ath11k-supported HW. Cause 80+80 and 160MHz support
>>> > bits are being cleared here so 160MHz is not being advertised after
>>> > this patch.
>>>
>>> Oh man, not good. Robert, should we revert this patchset entirely? Of
>>> course it would be better if Muna can submit quickly a fix, but I'm not
>>> going to wait for long.
>>
>> I would prefer to see it get fixed, cause just removing the flag
>> removal gets 160MHz working, but I am not sure about other flags as
>> well.
>
> Ok, let's try to get it fixed then. Muna, can you comment and send a fix
> ASAP?
No reply from Muna. I'll try the new bugbot to open a bug for this regression:
bugbot on
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
More information about the ath11k
mailing list