ath11k: does qmi support multiple soc

[fengbin]

yes, the debugfs patch has been applied.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 5:28 PM Robert Marko <robert.marko at sartura.hr> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:37 AM fengbin <arithdon at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have qca6390 and qcn9074 both of them works fine individually.
> > However when I install them together errors show up.
> >
> >
> > here is log with only 9074 installed:
> > [   17.759191] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi wifi fw qmi service
> > connected qmi:00000000181299d3 node:7, port:2
> > [   17.759197] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2709 qmi:00000000181299d3
> > [   17.760436] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2718 qmi:00000000181299d3
> > fw_ind_register completed.
> > [   17.761703] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2725 qmi:00000000181299d3
> > fw_ind_register host_cap completed.
> > [   17.767555] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x0 chip_family 0x0
> > board_id 0xff soc_id 0xffffffff
> > [   17.767559] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x2506844c
> > fw_build_timestamp 2021-07-13 10:24 fw_build_id
> > [   19.495395] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0 wlp1s0: renamed from wlan0
> >
> > and here is log with 6390+9074 and from the log it seems 01:00.01
> > device get same qmi messages twice and thus the host_cap request
> > failed the second time where chipset FW consider the host_cap request
> > is in bad state.
> >
> > [   19.106915] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem
> > 0x92000000-0x921fffff 64bit]
> > [   19.106947] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0100 -> 0102)
> > [   19.107355] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: MSI vectors: 16
> > [   19.107366] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qcn9074 hw1.0
> > [   19.107505] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: mhi controller registered
> > :0000000054128108 mhi_ctrl->index:0 mhi_ctrl->mhi_dev:mhi0
> > [   20.173172] ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem
> > 0x91000000-0x91ffffff 64bit]
> > [   20.173218] ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: enabling device (0100 -> 0102)
> > [   20.173937] ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: MSI vectors: 32
> > [   20.173959] ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: qca6390 hw2.0
> > [   20.174111] ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: mhi controller registered
> > :00000000c33f02d3 mhi_ctrl->index:1 mhi_ctrl->mhi_dev:mhi1
> > [   20.767399] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi wifi fw qmi service
> > connected qmi:00000000e25ddf03 node:7, port:2
> > [   20.767423] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2709 qmi:00000000e25ddf03
> > [   20.768739] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2718 qmi:00000000e25ddf03
> > fw_ind_register completed.
> > [   20.770333] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2725 qmi:00000000e25ddf03
> > fw_ind_register host_cap completed.
> > [   20.770375] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: qmi wifi fw qmi service
> > connected qmi:00000000e25ddf03 node:7, port:2
> > [   20.771668] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2709 qmi:00000000e25ddf03
> > [   20.776796] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0:
> > ath11k_qmi_event_server_arrive at 2718 qmi:00000000e25ddf03
> > fw_ind_register completed.
> > [   20.778021] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: host capability request failed: 1 90
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts and ideas of what might be the cause?
> > thanks
>
> Hi,
> I would second this question as I have the same issue with IPQ8074+QCN9074.
> Note that the multiple debugfs patch has already been applied.
>
> Regards,
> Robert
> >
> > --
> > arithdon
> >
> > --
> > ath11k mailing list
> > ath11k at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Marko
> Staff Embedded Linux Engineer
> Sartura Ltd.
> Lendavska ulica 16a
> 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
> Email: robert.marko at sartura.hr
> Web: www.sartura.hr



-- 
arithdon