High battery usage with ath11k on Dell 9310
Kalle Valo
kvalo at codeaurora.org
Sun Oct 10 22:41:24 PDT 2021
Mark Herbert <mark.herbert42 at gmail.com> writes:
> Simply disabling wifi drops 0.8-1 watts from power consumption.
> Comparing almost same model (16 gb RAM vs 32) but based on Intel card
> shows the same difference - Intel based laptop with WiFi connected
> consumes about same as ath11k with Wifi discnnected.
>
> Powertop newer shows PC states below PC6. Disabling WiFi allows PC8,
> disabling ath11k completely (bios) - PC10.
>
> Wifi enabled
>
> Pkg(HW)
> C2 (pc2) 18,5% |
> C3 (pc3) 14,2% |
> C6 (pc6) 47,5% |
> C7 (pc7) 0,0% |
> C8 (pc8) 0,0% |
> C9 (pc9) 0,0% |
> C10 (pc10) 0,0% |
>
> Wfi disabled (by networkmanager/nm-applet)
>
>
> Pkg(HW)
> C2 (pc2) 10,8% |
> C3 (pc3) 18,5% |
> C6 (pc6) 1,1% |
> C7 (pc7) 0,3% |
> C8 (pc8) 28,3% |
> C9 (pc9) 0,0% |
> C10 (pc10) 0,0% |
>
> Seems that even on no network activity ath11k forces CPU to stay awake
> and eat battery. There are some background transfer happening as I
> have Viber, thunderbird and firefox opened so I bet they do sent some
> but there is no file transfers, media streams etc. Under the same
> conditions (taking this disk from one 9310 to other 9310 - same
> software, same kernel - just wifi's different) - iwlwifi manages to
> reach PC8-PC10 being connected. With ath10k on dell XPS-13 9350 intel
> also was saving battery much better than ath10k, bit there was like
> 88% of PC10 with intel and 65% PC10 and 20% PC8 with ath10k. But it
> was not such terribly bad as with ath11.
>
> There is already kernel bug for this, not creating duplicates
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214543
Thanks for the excellent report and including all that information to
the bug report as well, we will investigate this.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
More information about the ath11k
mailing list