[PATCH 08/17] ath11k: Use memset_startat() for clearing queue descriptors
Kees Cook
keescook at chromium.org
Tue Dec 14 09:05:37 PST 2021
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:46:31PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Kalle Valo <kvalo at kernel.org> writes:
>
> > Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> writes:
> >
> >> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> >> field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
> >> neighboring fields.
> >>
> >> Use memset_startat() so memset() doesn't get confused about writing
> >> beyond the destination member that is intended to be the starting point
> >> of zeroing through the end of the struct. Additionally split up a later
> >> field-spanning memset() so that memset() can reason about the size.
> >>
> >> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo at codeaurora.org>
> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft.net>
> >> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
> >> Cc: ath11k at lists.infradead.org
> >> Cc: linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> >
> > What's the plan for this patch? I would like to take this via my ath
> > tree to avoid conflicts.
>
> Actually this has been already applied:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=ath-next&id=d5549e9a6b86
>
> Why are you submitting the same patch twice?
These are all part of a topic branch, and the cover letter mentioned
that a set of them have already been taken but haven't appeared in -next
(which was delayed).
Sorry for the confusion!
--
Kees Cook
More information about the ath11k
mailing list