[PATCH 3/3] ath11k: process full monitor mode rx support

[Anilkumar Kolli]

On 2021-11-12 13:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jouni Malinen <jouni at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
>> From: Anilkumar Kolli <akolli at codeaurora.org>
>> 
>> In full monitor mode, monitor destination ring is read before monitor
>> status ring. mon_dst_ring has ppdu id, reap till the end of PPDU. Add
>> all the MPDUs to list. Start processing the status ring, if PPDU id in
>> status ring is lagging behind, reap the status ring, once the PPDU ID
>> matches, deliver the MSDU to upper layer. If status PPDU id leading,
>> reap the mon_dst_ring. The advantage with full monitor mode is 
>> hardware
>> has status buffers available for all the MPDUs in mon_dst_ring.
>> 
>> Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI 
>> WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01734-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Anilkumar Kolli <akolli at codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni at codeaurora.org>
> 
> I changed the commit log to this to better describe how this patch 
> helps:
> 
>     ath11k: process full monitor mode rx support
> 
>     In full monitor mode, monitor destination ring is read before 
> monitor
>     status ring. mon_dst_ring has ppdu id, reap till the end of PPDU. 
> Add
>     all the MPDUs to list. Start processing the status ring, if PPDU id 
> in
>     status ring is lagging behind, reap the status ring, once the PPDU 
> ID
>     matches, deliver the MSDU to upper layer. If status PPDU id 
> leading,
>     reap the mon_dst_ring.
> 
>     The advantage with full monitor mode is hardware has status
> buffers available
>     for all the MPDUs in mon_dst_ring, which makes it possible to 
> deliver more
>     frames to be seen on sniffer.
> 
>     Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI 
> WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01734-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
> 
> But now I see a new warning with QCA6390 caused by patch 3. Please fix
> that and submit v2.
> 
> [  108.354361] ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: chip_id 0x0 chip_family 0xb
> board_id 0xff soc_id 0xffffffff
> [  108.354547] ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: fw_version 0x101c06cc
> fw_build_timestamp 2020-06-24 19:50 fw_build_id
> [  110.995359] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [  110.995429] The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> [  110.995489] you didn't initialize this object before use?
> [  110.995546] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [  110.995604] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G
>       W         5.15.0-wt-ath+ #522
> [  110.995664] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems
> NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0067.2021.0528.1339 05/28/2021
> [  110.995720] Call Trace:
> [  110.995774]  <IRQ>
> [  110.995828]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
> [  110.995887]  register_lock_class+0x1604/0x17e0
> [  110.995945]  ? check_prev_add+0x7bb/0x20f0
> [  110.996002]  ? is_dynamic_key+0x1a0/0x1a0
> [  110.996058]  ? validate_chain+0xac3/0x1b30
> [  110.996127]  __lock_acquire+0x96/0x1870
> [  110.996196]  ? check_prev_add+0x20f0/0x20f0
> [  110.996266]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x15/0x1b0
> [  110.996339]  ? mark_lock+0xd0/0x14a0
> [  110.996401]  lock_acquire.part.0+0x117/0x340
> [  110.996470]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
> [ath11k]
> [  110.996553]  ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40
> [  110.996622]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3a/0x70
> [  110.996685]  ? lock_acquire+0x1a8/0x210
> [  110.996751]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
> [ath11k]
> [  110.996831]  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x80
> [  110.996892]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
> [ath11k]
> [  110.996971]  ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
> [ath11k]
> [  110.997071]  ? ath11k_dp_rxbufs_replenish+0x7a0/0x7a0 [ath11k]
> [  110.997187]  ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xe0
> [  110.997272]  ? ath11k_hal_rx_parse_mon_status_tlv+0x6d7/0x1880 
> [ath11k]
> [  110.997389]  ? ath11k_hal_rx_parse_mon_status+0xed/0x170 [ath11k]
> [  110.997506]  ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x3f9/0x580 [ath11k]
> [  110.997600]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_pdev_alloc+0xd50/0xd50 [ath11k]
> [  110.997680]  ath11k_dp_service_mon_ring+0x67/0xe0 [ath11k]
> [  110.997759]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x580/0x580 [ath11k]
> [  110.997835]  call_timer_fn+0x167/0x4a0
> [  110.997903]  ? add_timer_on+0x3b0/0x3b0
> [  110.997967]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x18c/0x370
> [  110.998031]  __run_timers.part.0+0x539/0x8b0
> [  110.998123]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x580/0x580 [ath11k]
> [  110.998228]  ? call_timer_fn+0x4a0/0x4a0
> [  110.998314]  ? clockevents_program_event+0xdd/0x280
> [  110.998408]  ? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10
> [  110.998496]  ? ktime_get+0x119/0x2f0
> [  110.998579]  ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x32f/0x770
> [  110.998679]  run_timer_softirq+0x97/0x180
> [  110.998764]  __do_softirq+0x276/0x86a
> [  110.998850]  __irq_exit_rcu+0x11c/0x180
> [  110.998934]  irq_exit_rcu+0x5/0x20
> [  110.999017]  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8e/0xc0
> [  110.999100]  </IRQ>
> [  110.999181]  <TASK>
> [  110.999261]  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20

I have posted v2 patch. With v2, I did not see the issue with QCA6390 
during the bootup.

Thanks
Anil