[PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix QCOM_RPROC_COMMON dependency
Jeff Johnson
quic_jjohnson at quicinc.com
Tue May 14 07:43:25 PDT 2024
On 5/11/2024 3:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> If ath10k_snoc is built-in, while Qualcomm remoteprocs are built as
> modules, compilation fails with:
>
> /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.o: in function `ath10k_modem_init':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c:1534: undefined reference to `qcom_register_ssr_notifier'
> /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.o: in function `ath10k_modem_deinit':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c:1551: undefined reference to `qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier'
>
> Add corresponding dependency to ATH10K_SNOC Kconfig entry so that it's
> built as module if QCOM_RPROC_COMMON is built as module too.
>
> Fixes: 747ff7d3d742 ("ath10k: Don't always treat modem stop events as crashes")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
> index e6ea884cafc1..4f385f4a8cef 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ config ATH10K_SNOC
> depends on ATH10K
> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
> depends on QCOM_SMEM
> + depends on QCOM_RPROC_COMMON || QCOM_RPROC_COMMON=n
> select QCOM_SCM
> select QCOM_QMI_HELPERS
> help
>
> ---
> base-commit: 75fa778d74b786a1608d55d655d42b480a6fa8bd
> change-id: 20240511-ath10k-snoc-dep-862a9da2e6bb
I see how this fixes the problem, but this doesn't seem like an ideal
solution. The fact that the *_ssr_notifier() functions are correctly protected
by conditional compilation ideally should mean that clients don't need to call
call out this as a dependency. Otherwise, it would mean we'd need to do this
for all feature flags.
+linux-kbuild just to make sure there isn't a better approach.
/jeff
More information about the ath10k
mailing list