[PATCH 01/13] ath10k: platform driver for WCN3990 SNOC WLAN module

Govind Singh govinds at qti.qualcomm.com
Thu Mar 1 02:13:35 PST 2018


Hi Kalle,

I didn't encountered this issue as in my defconfig only CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC was defined.
This problem is coming when we define CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC and CONFIG_ATH10K_PCI simultaneously in defconfig and this is 
known issue when multiple modules share objects(in this case ce.o). I saw similar reported problem and found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060825/.

After picking the below change issue is not seen.

BR,
Govind

-----Original Message-----
From: ath10k [mailto:ath10k-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Kalle Valo
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 3:37 PM
To: Govind Singh <govinds at codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org; ath10k at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] ath10k: platform driver for WCN3990 SNOC WLAN module

Govind Singh <govinds at codeaurora.org> writes:

> WCN3990 is integrated 802.11ac chipset with SNOC bus interface. Add 
> snoc layer driver registration and associated ops.
>
> WCN3990 support is not yet complete as cold-boot handshake is done 
> using qmi(Qualcomm-MSM-Interface) and qmi client support will be added 
> once qmi framework is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Govind Singh <govinds at codeaurora.org>

Kbuild bot found an odd problem with this patch:

 include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:77:14: error: 'KBUILD_MODNAME'
 undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean  'KBUILD_BASENAME'?

Full report:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2018-February/010907.html

Any ideas? Is this is some unrelated issue or what? This patch is not even touching hif.h or ce.c.

--
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k



More information about the ath10k mailing list