ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed() noise

[Gabriel C]

On 18.07.2017 09:14, Ryan Hsu wrote:
> On 07/16/2017 03:56 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
> 
>>
>> Can ath10k_warn() be ath10k_dbg() there ? Maybe this ?
>>
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
>>
>>  From d4138d936635ca7b69ed7f7b0cda4914f0f07917 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die at gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:45:29 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed(): change ath10k_warn() to th10k_dbg()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> index 398dda978d6e..ad0306cd6ee1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> @@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static bool ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed(struct ath10k *ar,
>>           */
>>
>>          if (!rx_status->freq) {
>> -               ath10k_warn(ar, "no channel configured; ignoriframe(s)!\n");
>> +               ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_HTT, "no channel configured, ignoring frame(s)!\n");
>>                  return false;
>>          }
>>
> 
> Can you send this as patch for reviewing, please?
> 

Sure .. I'll try to send the patch to the list later on today..

Regards,

Gabriel C