[PATCH v2 04/21] ath10k: rate-limit packet tx errors
Valo, Kalle
kvalo at qca.qualcomm.com
Thu Sep 15 06:59:48 PDT 2016
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> writes:
> On 09/14/2016 07:07 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>> greearb at candelatech.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
>>>
>>> When firmware crashes, stack can continue to send packets
>>> for a bit, and existing code was spamming logs.
>>>
>>> So, rate-limit the error message for tx failures.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 5 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>>> index cd3016d..42cac32 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>>> @@ -3432,8 +3432,9 @@ static int ath10k_mac_tx_submit(struct ath10k *ar,
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (ret) {
>>> - ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to transmit packet, dropping: %d\n",
>>> - ret);
>>> + if (net_ratelimit())
>>> + ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to transmit packet, dropping: %d\n",
>>> + ret);
>>> ieee80211_free_txskb(ar->hw, skb);
>>> }
>>
>> ath10k_warn() is already rate limited. If there's something wrong then
>> that function should be fixed, not the callers.
>>
>> void ath10k_warn(struct ath10k *ar, const char *fmt, ...)
>> {
>> struct va_format vaf = {
>> .fmt = fmt,
>> };
>> va_list args;
>>
>> va_start(args, fmt);
>> vaf.va = &args;
>> dev_warn_ratelimited(ar->dev, "%pV", &vaf);
>> trace_ath10k_log_warn(ar, &vaf);
>>
>> va_end(args);
>> }
>
> The problem with having the ratelimit here is that you may miss
> rare warnings due to a flood of common warnings.
>
> That is why it is still useful to ratelimit potential floods
> of warnings.
I think this is a common problem in kernel, not specific to ath10k. For
starters you could configure the limits dev_warn_ratelimited() has, not
trying to workaround it in the driver.
> I would like to remove the ratelimit from ath10k_warn eventually.
I think that's not a good idea, it might cause unnecessary host reboots
in problem cases. Rate limitting the messages is much better option.
--
Kalle Valo
More information about the ath10k
mailing list