[RFC 09/12] ath10k: Mailbox address definitions

[Valo, Kalle]

Michal Kazior <michal.kazior at tieto.com> writes:

> On 14 November 2016 at 17:33, Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Address definitions for SDIO/mbox based chipsets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
>> index 883547f..46142e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
>> @@ -814,6 +814,59 @@ struct ath10k_hw_ops {
>>  #define QCA9887_EEPROM_ADDR_LO_MASK            0x00ff0000
>>  #define QCA9887_EEPROM_ADDR_LO_LSB             16
>>
>> +#define MBOX_RESET_CONTROL_ADDRESS             0x00000000
>> +#define MBOX_HOST_INT_STATUS_ADDRESS           0x00000800
>> +#define MBOX_HOST_INT_STATUS_ERROR_LSB         7
>> +#define MBOX_HOST_INT_STATUS_ERROR_MASK                0x00000080
>
> I would again suggest using Jakub's bitfield GET_FIELD stuff to get
> rid of MASK+LSB and just have single define per register field. Kalle,
> thoughts?

Same comment as with the other patch, very much preferred but not a hard
requirement.

-- 
Kalle Valo