[Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood)

David Lang david at lang.hm
Mon May 16 01:12:59 PDT 2016


On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:

> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>
>> That is too low a limit, also, for normal use. And:
>> for the purpose of this particular UDP test, flows 16 is ok, but not
>> ideal.
>
> I played with different combinations, it doesn't make any
> (significant) difference: 20-30Mbps, not more.
> What numbers would you propose?

How many different flows did you have going at once? I believe that the reason 
for higher numbers isn't for throughput, but to allow for more flows to be 
isolated from each other. If you have too few buckets, different flows will end 
up being combined into one bucket so that one will affect the other more.

David Lang



More information about the ath10k mailing list