[PATCH] cfg80211/nl80211: Add support for NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION

[Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan]

Hi Johannes,

https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/chromium-os-reviews/lDzKxgl6fIE/H5GQfMcuBwAJ

for more information regarding the request for implementation. I will send a v2
re-phrasing that it is implementation specific.

regards,
shafi


On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:50:36PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
> Hi johannes,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:07:51PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 21:30 +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
> > 
> > > [shafi] This is part of the Per Station statistics requirement,
> > 
> > Heh. Whose requirements? :)
> 
> [shafi] We have this as part of ath10k debugfs based on the end user (or) a
> customer requirement and i think its make more sense to have this common across all
> wifi drivers rather thank simply dumping it in ath10k debugfs. I think its
> similar to 'ieee80211_frame_duration'(?) in mac80211 but for drivers like ath10k
> where this is calculated in firmware for rx and implementation specific.
> 
> > 
> > > the information from 'iw dev wlan#N station dump' which has
> > > rx_duration
> > > field will be used by application assesing the statistics
> > > /performance of various clients connected to our AP. We will plot
> > > a graph based on this information (assesing the rx time spent by
> > > AP for various clients).
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Are you really sure you mean "unicast"? What if the station is the
> > > > AP? Why wouldn't multicast frames it transmitted be accounted for?
> > > 
> > > [shafi] This is based on the implementation by the driver/firmware.
> > > We are focused on the AP side so unicast frames, if you are ok with
> > > this change, i can change the documentation to be specific (generic
> > > for all the drivers)  something like implementation specific (please
> > > advise)
> > 
> > Ok, but for AP side I don't see the difference between "unicast" and
> > "all frames", since all frames from that station should be unicast?
> > Apart, perhaps, from some management frames the station might send
> > outside the BSS, but that's not likely to matter much?
> 
> [shafi] exactly, I can change the documentation as you wish and
> this is implementation specific, and we have implemented like this in ath10k
> targeting AP mode.
> 
> > 
> > IOW, why not specify all frames, and let this make some sense for other
> > interface modes?
> >
> [shafi] Agreed.
> 
> regards,
> shafi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html