ath10k drivers on t1024 freescale board

[B R Manjula]

thanks for input...

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 13:02:29 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote
> On 12 January 2016 at 09:17, B R Manjula <brm at cdot.in> wrote:
> > Thanks for your input which version of the backport to be taken for kernel 3.12
> >
> > backports-4.2.6-1       signed
> > backports-4.1.1-1       signed
> > backports-4.0.1-1       signed
> > backports-3.19-rc1-1    signed
> > backports-3.18.1-1      signed
> > backports-3.17.1-1      signed
> > backports-3.16.2-1      signed
> > backports-3.15.9-1      signed
> > backports-3.14-1        signed
> > backports-3.12.8-1      signed
> > backports-3.10.19-1     signed
> 
> All of them should work. That's how backports work:
> 
>   https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Documentation
> 
> > where do we get otp.bin file
> 
> You don't. It's embedded in FW API2 firmware blobs. FW API1 is very
> old and I would discourage using a driver which requires it. FYI You
> can still get it either by extracting it or using older git checkout:
> 
>   https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-
firmware/tree/9374d42c01bd84487855af9f9bffc622c50e7331/ath10k/QCA988X/hw2.0
> 
> Michał
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


Disclaimer:
----------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The 
sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail t