[PATCH 2/4] cfg80211: Add new NL80211_CMD_SET_BTCOEX_PRIORITY to support BTCOEX

[Johannes Berg]

> > >  /**
> > > + * wiphy_btcoex_support_flags
> > > + *	This enum has the driver supported frame types for
> > > BTCOEX.
> > > + * @WIPHY_WLAN_BE_PREFERRED - Supports Best Effort frame for
> > > BTCOEX
> > > + * @WIPHY_WLAN_BK_PREFERRED - supports Background frame for
> > > BTCOEX
> > > + * @WIPHY_WLAN_VI_PREFERRED - supports Video frame for BTCOEX
> > > + * @WIPHY_WLAN_VO_PREFERRED - supports Voice frame for BTCOEX
> > > + * @WIPHY_WLAN_BEACON_PREFERRED - supports Beacon frame for
> > > BTCOEX
> > > + * @WIPHY_WLAN_MGMT_PREFERRED - supports Management frames for
> > > BTCOEX.
> > > + */
> > 
> > That's not making much sense to me?
> > 
> 
> is it fine to have as WIPHY_BTCOEX_BE_PREFERRED ?

It's not really clear to me what you intend to do this - if it's really
support flags then you really should name those better.

> > > +/**
> > > + * enum wiphy_btcoex_priority - BTCOEX priority level
> > > + *	This enum defines priority level for BTCOEX
> > > + * WIPHY_WLAN_PREFERRED_LOW - low priority frames over BT
> > > traffic
> > > + * WIPHY_WLAN_PREFERRED_HIGH - high priority frames over BT
> > > traffic
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +enum wiphy_btcoex_priority {
> > > +	WIPHY_WLAN_PREFERRED_LOW = false,
> > > +	WIPHY_WLAN_PREFERRED_HIGH = true,
> > > +};
> > 
> > That false/true seems just strange.
> > 
> 
> I will just use as a enum without assigning false/true.

What do you even need this enum for though?

> > > +enum nl80211_btcoex_priority {
> > > +	__NL80211_WLAN_PREFERRED_INVALID,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_BE_PREFERRED,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_BK_PREFERRED,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_VI_PREFERRED,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_VO_PREFERRED,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_BEACON_PREFERRED,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_MGMT_PREFERRED,
> > > +	__NL80211_WLAN_PREFERRED_LAST,
> > > +	NL80211_WLAN_PREFERRED_MAX =
> > > +			__NL80211_WLAN_PREFERRED_LAST - 1,
> > > +};
> > 
> > Wouldn't a bitmap be easier?
> > 
> since this is to distinguish between different btcoex priorities and
> we 
> are not going to do any manipulations on these parameters.
> It is just used as flag attribute.

But why the (parsing) complexity, when a single bitmap would do?

johannes