Support for QCA6174 [168c:003e]
michaelkrupp at gmx.net
Tue Oct 27 05:01:20 PDT 2015
thank you for pointing me to those discussions.
I will repeat my tests using iperf to also cover UDP, and will also try some
older kernel releases, pre-dating 3.19. Also I'll try another AP as mentioned
On 10/27/2015 12:27 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 27 October 2015 at 12:22, Michael Krupp <michaelkrupp at gmx.net> wrote:
>> Hello Michał
>> yes, I checked the actual performance via netcat, scp and rsync. I'll report
>> back once I have tested against another AP.
> TCP performance is known to be tricky/poor in various scenarios. There
> were some discussions in the past:
> - http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2015-October/006160.html
> - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/348420
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k at lists.infradead.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the ath10k