[PATCH] ath10k: request firmware flush in ath10k_flush.

[Ben Greear]

On 09/29/2014 03:53 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:

>> Thanks. I think ath10k should do this instead of having CT-specific
>> flush eventually.
> 
> I agree. We should not be forking functionality unless absolutely
> necessary.

Ok, this patch is easy to carry in my own tree.

But, for things upstream firmware just cannot support,
like tx-rate-status and rx-software-crypt, how do you
want it flagged in the driver?  Can I get the CT firmware
flag in for that, or does it have to be some other way?

If you just will not accept any such patch, let me know so
I can quite bothering you about it.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com