Question on beacon-miss handling.

[Ben Greear]

On 07/06/2014 08:37 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> Maybe the driver should make this 0 instead of 2 then?
>> hw.h:#define TARGET_10X_BMISS_OFFLOAD_MAX_VDEV	2
>> That would save resources in the firmware.
>
> Yes, it would. ath10k doesn't seem to be handling roam
> events too, so maybe that can be set to 0 - not sure if
> there are plans to properly enable and use roaming functionality
> that is already in the firmware.

I have set both to zero when using my firmware, and so far, everything
seems to be working fine.

I am tempted to just compile the roaming and beacon-miss code entirely
out of the firmware to save a bit of memory, but I guess that might
possibly break some driver, so if I do, I will have to add a new
firmware image variant...

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com