[PATCH v2 0/4] ath10k: fixes

[Kalle Valo]

"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof at do-not-panic.com> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior at tieto.com> wrote:
>>   ath10k: fix issues on non-preemptible systems
>
> This patch looks like a stable candidate fix. Please annotate as such
> if you confirm. Also, I reviewed other ath10k "fixes" and I see no
> practice of propagating any patches to stable yet. Can you please
> start doing that? If there were patches which are already merged
> upstream that should be propagated to stable then they can be
> submitted as stable candidate patches.

I disagree. The point of linux-stable is _not_ that we send all possible
fixes to stable. Instead we should send fixes only which really matter
to users and for which we have received bug reports. I haven't yet seen
any fix for ath10k which should be a candidate for stable releases.

If we start sending all ath10k fixes to stable it's just extra churn for
both Greg and people working on ath10k.

-- 
Kalle Valo